THE NAME CODE I.

The Path to Graceland

THE NAME CODE

Code Explanation

HOW IT WORKS AND WHY NO ONE FOUND IT BEFORE.

The Name Code messages are encoded by a cunning interaction of the Hebrew and English languages.

Most of the approximately 300 name message carriers lived in the last three centuries. Most of these name message carriers appear grouped in ordered sequences. These sequences include all Presidents of America, and all Prime Ministers of Australia, Israel and Great Britain. Such sequential concentrations hardly appear random.

It is found that the name-messages decoded effortlessly match the reputations of the respective national leaders and the events by which they are best remembered.

A sceptic might argue that if predictive messages really did exist within the names of American or Israeli national leaders, someone would have noticed it by now. Millions of people speak both English and Hebrew. Surely one of them would have noticed the strange phenomenon.

The fact is that they have not and the reason is quite simple.

Codes by definition always include features that separate them from normal everyday language. Once these systematic deviations from normal script are fully recognized then the code is broken and one can access the hidden message. The systematic linguistic deviations that are the basis of the Name Code messages are both simple and cunning.

 

THE NAME CODE METHOD:

How to find the message.

First one considers the names of the individual in question. ( For example George Walker Bush . ) It is a name that has been printed in Hebrew and English thousands of times. So where is the message?

(1) All three names have well known meanings. George ( from the Greek ) means farmer. Walker means walker and Bush means bush. It is correct to say that none of the Hebrew equivalents of these names are ever used when George Walker Bush is referred to in the Israeli press. He is never called President Haklai Metyel Shiakh.

His name is only ever written phonetically, but it must be conceded that his names also have literal translations that could be applied and substituted. Many permutations are created by mixing the phonetic and literal alternatives. Also, people's names can appear in various legitimate abbreviated forms.

George Walker B., George W. Bush or G.W. Bush are all recognizable ways to identify this individual from millions of others.

So, under the name code methods, a name such as Bush can be translated according to its literal meaning or translated phonetically to match how it sounds.

There is a slight variation on the phonetic spelling of some names that has to also be considered. Taking the name PRESLEY as an example, one first considers which letters will find representation in a Hebrew spelling of the name.

The answer is simple: they are P, R, S, L and Y.

Four of these letters ( P, R, L and Y ) present no problem at all.

They have only one letter each in Hebrew that corresponds to the English letter. But 'S' is a different matter altogether.

Commonly three different Hebrew letters are all translated into English as an 'S'. ( As is found for example in three names such as Jerusalem, Massada and Sinai .) So which of these three 'S' letters should one use in spelling PRESLEY?

The answer is to consider all possibilities.

(2) Having decided on the form the name will take ( be it phonetic , literal or a mixture of both ) one writes it in Hebrew both forward and then backward as an exact reverse respelling, omitting word breaks. For example :
ELVISPRSLYYLSRPSIVLE

(3) Recognized Hebrew names ( e. g. Rachel, Benjamin etc. ) are spelt as they normally would be in that language. With non-Hebrew names, all phonetic variations should be considered.

(4) One then looks for any Hebrew words to be found in the linear alignment of letters that appear unusually biographically descriptive of the individual in question. One next tries to translate the grammatical context in which these key words appear. If one is successful, then one has possibly found a name-message. In some cases ten or eleven consecutive translations of the forward and backward name alignment will reveal a message of considerable length and detail.

(5) It must be noted however, that the grammatical construction used in the messages generally follows that of English, not that of Hebrew. ( The messages are best recognized written in Hebrew but directly translated and read aloud in English .) The messages also are abbreviated in exactly the same way as has become popular with mobile telephone text messages. Often, instead of using the longer Hebrew pronouns, conjunctions and adverbs of three or four letters, it employs the Hebrew one letter alternatives. Although undoubtedly grammatically incorrect as judged by textbook Hebrew, the name-messages ( like their SMS 'cousins' ) remain totally intelligible once one recognises the systematic abbreviations.

(7) Hebrew lacks words that correspond to the English 'a' , 'an' and 'is'. It is universal practice to add these words where needed to any English text translated from the Hebrew. The Name Code messages follow the same convention.

(8) All words in the name-messages can be found in a Complete Hebrew Dictionary. The dictionary functions as one's Code Book, not as a normal dictionary.

(9) When Hebrew books such as the Old Testament are translated into English considerable latitude is taken by the translaters to present a text that is most easily read and understood in English. They never feel bound to perform a literal word for word translation, and they certainly never follow the policy of adhering to the exact word order found in the original Hebrew text. Here the Name Code translations are quite different : what appears in the Hebrew is almost always exactly what is translated into the English.

VISUALISING THE NAME CODE

The code reading process can be visualised in two different ways:

(1) as a straight line of letters.

(2) as a circle.

THE LINE.

One can take a name such as THE NAME CODE and write it in Hebrew with no word breaks. One has a line of six letters.

Spell it backward and one now has an alignment of twelve letters.

One can then repeat the process for as many times as one needs to extract a message.

THE CIRCLE

A simpler way to imagine the code reading process is by looping the forward and reverse reading of the letters around into a circle.

The number of letters in the alignment has now increased from six...to twelve...to infinite. The Name Circle can now be rotated and read in either direction.

A more detailed explanation of the functions of the code is found in THE NAME CODE books and is available as part of a free download. See BUYING THE BOOKS / DOWNLOADS.

 

IN SUMMARY:

With an understanding of the points mentioned above, one starts to appreciate why the Name Code has laid undiscovered for so long:

Most English speakers have no knowledge of Hebrew and so are totally oblivious to the parts of 'English' names that mimic Hebrew words and phrases.

Most Hebrew speakers do not translate names both literally and phonetically into that language before writing them forward and backward , regrouping the letters and then seeking a comprehensive message by applying English syntax and abbreviated Hebrew grammar.

If they had they would be most surprised at the results, provided they looked in the right peoples' names. But here again the odds are stacked against them. Less than one in a ten million personal names carries a comprehensive name message.

 

Many people might feel that given the methods of translation detailed above that it would be very easy to contrive virtually any message into any given name. If that is their conclusion then they are wrong. ( see Proof & Disproof ) In fact, given the methods described above, it is impossible to contrive any preconceived message into any given name. And the messages associated with President George Walker Bush are fine examples of this fact. The interplay of the phonetic and literal translation of his names allows for dozens of startlingly biographic messages to be hidden.The subject of these name messages is disturbingingly current. For a couple of fully illustrated examples, see G.W. BUSH.

 

 

Home